Like Evil Roc points out the slowness is their main problem. Seriously, though, there are a lot more units I fear than warlords. And again units with entangle, web, seduce, cold/lightning ranged attacks. Catapults can be a good option with their area fire attack which hits almost always. Just avoid using low accuracy ranged units such as archers and use some more accurate shooters. Defending city should be quite easy as warlords are slow. Trying to overpower them just by force can be a not very good idea as warlords are very powerful in simple meele. Nymphs, succubuses, vampires, lightning catchers, doom wolfes, druids (entangle). You can easely dispell all that stuff.Īnd if you want counter warlords in battle try using units wich can exploit low resistance of warlord and his lack of wilpower.
Generaly if you use some kind of border watch you will see warlords coming and will have few turns to respond (again because they are slow). If The warlord is "overclocked" as you call it a dispel spell will help you. Warlords will be unable to catch your faster army and it will be quite frustrating to the warlords player. You may be unable to win a big battle in field but you can hit and run, hit and run, capturing towns and resourses. Just do not sit patiently in capital and wait for them to come - use your offensive forces as well. If your army consists of fast soldiers (and there are many options there - knights, chieftains, iron maidens etc) you will be able to move around much faster then these warlords. If countering warlords the first part will be try to outmaneur them on global map. Hmm actualy warlords are not very useful, because they are so slow.
0 kommentar(er)
